In exchange for double-opting in to our Biosecurity mail list, we give you Basic Membership status which entitles you to some information non-subscribers don't receive. It's fast, easy, and free. We do not sell or distribute your email address outside of MDYNE. For starters, we give you access to the Bird Flu defense files. Whenever there are major site revisions or news releases, we tell you.
I am a big fan and also a critic of a great homeopathic physician abroad who has tended to over 5,000 cancer patients using mostly homeopathy. Below is a chart of his best homeopathic cure rates per cancer type using almost no Conventional Medicine, dietary protocols, or Natural Medicine as of 2001. He's very, very good. His scores against cancer are better than any doctor in the world I know about at the moment, but I continue to suspect his methods very lethal in the weaker cancer cases. If his best methodology were further improved, I believe all of these statistics would be improved -- particularly in the weak cases. If more attention were paid to a suitable mixture of Natural Medicine and Orthomolecular foundation with his methods while utilizing more appropriate methods of Advanced Classical Homeopathy....then, we'd actually improve these numbers!
* It should be noted to my readers that these statistics most certainly do not apply to the majority of the world's homeopathic prescribers. If you have cancer and are looking to a homeopath for help, do not deal with anyone who does not fully disclose their victories and failures. Most don't even keep score. The better ones do. It is not a scientific method if you don't. This chart I've compiled below represents about what is the best in the world and latest, pure homeopathic power against various cancer forms. That curative power can be amplified or degraded by integration with Conventional, Natural, and other styles of Medicine. The trick is to apply our methodology properly from the start while properly integrating with the best of what presently exists.
Whatever system the reader be under, make sure to compare these stats with those of your other medical options. In some easier forms of cancer, Conventional Medicine is the most horrible course to take. When dealing with a more complex and entrenched case -- such as Multiple Myeloma, Leukemia, or Liver Cancer -- sometimes it helps to cheat a bit at times with Conventional drugs and therapies, and then back off while cleaning up those damages done. Whatever it takes to get the job done! Radiation, Surgery, Bone Marrow transplant (using your own cells, non-embryonic stem cell cultivation, etc) and cytotoxic drugs can be of great benefit and ought not be written off by the Alternative Medicine fan so soon. While these methods do much damage, they are in keeping with the philosophy that sometimes, in homeopathy, you are best to attack at the pathology first and then clean up the case over time. More important than any of that, it always just depends upon what the patient wants to do.
The scores of mostly pure homeopathy:
Cancer form
No. of Patients after 1993
% Success
Notes
Brain
250
70
Oral Cavity
150
86
Larynx/Vocal
100
70
Thyroid/Parotid
40
71
Esophagus
210
80
Mediastinal
40
73
Breast
380
80
Lung
90
58
Weakened patient, usually; Vitality core.
Stomach
130
55
Weakened patient,usually; Vitality core.
Pancreas
98
75
Liver
312
32
Very weakened patients; Vitality core.
Colon
290
40
Weakend patients; Vitality core.
Rectum
170
82
Bladder
94
72
Prostate
150
80
Ovary
95
69
Unknown reasons, to this author, why it is a tougher cancer.
Uterus
120
45
Unknown reasons. Hormonal feeding of metastasis?
Cervix
104
68
Bone
114
74
Leukemia
205
54
Weakened patients; Vitality core.
Hodgkin's Lymphoma
85
77
Melanoma
52
71
Skin
45
80
WHERE ARE WE FAILING TO RENDER PERFECT CURE?!
The lowest statistical cures for cancer tend to be in those pathologies where the patient is stricken at the core of vitality -- blood, digestion/nutrition/absorption, breathing (not to mention smoking's overall vitality assault and systemic wear-down, particularly upon the liver and other negative lifestyle/ mental factors common to the smoker). While these patients respond well to high potency remedies, it takes years and decades for cancer to reach at such a deep level -- therefore, aggressive medicine in trying to produce a rapid cure will tend to break the patient where lower potency remedies, nutritional support, and return to a normal lifestyle slowly will not. As is typical of all curative actions upon chronic disease, once the medicine makes the patient feel better, they are all the more likely to go out and overexert themselves -- feeling completely fine the whole time under artificial sensations. Here, homeopathy has cured the symptoms expressed but not dealt with the underlying, subtle disease picture and full symptom set -- often due to over-reliance upon the Kentian prescribing models.
One cannot take in a serious cancer case among a 1 to 2 hour office interview with 30 minute follow-ups thereafter. It takes about a week of near full-time analysis and library research just to begin such cases. You have to start the curative ball rolling gently so as not to lose control of the case in the early stages. Once a remission trend is established, it does not matter about the speed of cure. The case is under control and ought not be sped to cure because it takes the body time to adjust and rebuild.
If the medicinal action upon the Vital Force too far exceeds the body's restorative time and capacity to rebuild, the patient will always develop new disease patterns, symptom spikes, and breakdown somewhere -- often with lethal consequences as a direct function of the medicinal aggression.
What is being performed among these patient losses is essentially Aggravation at high potency under not exactly matched remedies because no remedy is ever an exact fit. As the case changes, the spin upon the potter's wheel induced has too much angular momentum and the physician is not given enough time to adapt to patient needs and properly shape the "clay" due to the rapidity in which he attempts to invoke cure. One does not assemble a masterpiece in pottery by being quick, harsh, and sloppy. There is no rush. The slower and more gentle the approach -- particularly in the worst, deepest-reaching, and longest in previous pathologic course -- to chronic disease, the less we damage or kill the patient. With these weak patients, it is a very simple matter to cause aggravation in them of such severity that lethality is induced near instantly. Such can be done with homeopathic remedies even among the very strong and healthy patients.
It is a complete myth and most naive view of pharmacology that homeopathy "does no harm" and can only do good wonders. If such were the truth, the old masters would not have lectured on it, argued over methodology, and Hahnemann would never have told us it is our duty to anti-dote when we botch a case. Homeopaths: do not lie to yourselves or the patient.
